CR
California Resources Corp (CRC)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- CRC delivered a clean beat on Q1 2025: adjusted EPS $1.07 vs S&P Global consensus $0.77*, revenue $912M vs $861.6M*, and adjusted EBITDAX $328M vs EBITDA consensus $283M*, driven by cost discipline and realized Aera synergies .
- Reaffirmed full-year 2025 production (132–138 MBoe/d), capital ($285–$335M), and adjusted EBITDAX ($1.1–$1.2B) guidance; raised 2025 electricity margin outlook to $175–$190M from $120–$145M, and lowered consolidated G&A and operating cost guidance, improving quality of earnings .
- Returned a record $258M in Q1 (buybacks $100M, dividends $35M, debt repurchases $123M); liquidity of ~$1.18B at quarter-end with $199M cash and $983M undrawn RCF .
- Management highlighted 70% oil hedged for 2025 and a corporate breakeven around $34 Brent, plus visible CCS and power catalysts (first CO₂ injection by YE25; progressing PPA with hyperscalers), providing downside protection and upside optionality .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- Cost wins and synergy capture: CRC realized $173M of Aera-related synergies YTD (on track for $185M by YE25; remainder early 2026); Q1 OpEx+G&A were ~5% better than guidance, enabling beats across metrics .
- Cash returns and balance sheet: Record $258M returned (buybacks, dividend, debt redemption); $1.18B liquidity; RCF borrowing base reaffirmed at $1.5B in April .
- Strategy/hedges: CEO emphasized an integrated portfolio (low-decline O&G, scalable CCS, power); “70% of oil production hedged for 2025,” underpinning cash generation across cycles .
- What Went Wrong
- Electricity margin stepped down sequentially ($12M vs $30M in Q4), reflecting lower merchant price capture/seasonality; management is offsetting via capacity revenues and operating configuration .
- Effective tax rate increased to 29% from 20% in Q4; income tax provision $47M in Q1 vs $8M in Q4, modestly tempering net income leverage .
- Q2 production guide implies a BOE step-down (133–137 MBoe/d vs 141 in Q1) as CRC re-allocates gas to internal power/Belridge to optimize cash flow—supportive for margins but optical negative for volume screens .
Financial Results
Key P&L, cash flow, and volume trend (oldest → newest):
Consensus vs actual (Q1 2025):
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment performance (Adjusted EBITDAX, oldest → newest):
KPIs (oldest → newest):
Guidance Changes
Note: Prior 2025 “Operating Costs and CMB expenses” presentation was consolidated; Q1 guidance presents consolidated operating costs with separate CMB line items. Ranges are comparable at the consolidated level .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Our integrated strategy—anchored by low-decline conventional assets, a scalable carbon management platform, and power solutions—positions us to generate sustainable free cash flow across cycles.” — CEO Francisco Leon .
- “This quarter, our results exceeded the Street's expectations… all of which came in above consensus. This performance was primarily driven by our continued cost discipline.” — CFO Clio Crespy .
- “Our corporate breakeven is around $34 Brent… we have taken steps to be ready for volatility… to deliver sustainable capital return.” — CEO Francisco Leon .
- “We are advancing the state's first CCS project at Elk Hills… on track for first CO₂ injection by year-end 2025.” — CEO Francisco Leon .
- “We’re pursuing multiple opportunities with AI data center companies… our offering is differentiated and resonating.” — CEO/CFO on PPA discussions .
Q&A Highlights
- Synergies and cost drivers: Execution on supply chain, infrastructure consolidation, and synergy pull-forward are reducing OpEx and supporting reaffirmed guidance despite lower Brent .
- Breakeven and hedging: Corporate breakeven ~$34 Brent; strategy built to sustain returns through cycles with robust hedge book and low-decline assets .
- Refinery landscape: No concern on California refinery closures; CRC barrels have preferential placement and realize near-Brent pricing given crude quality .
- Q2 production guide dynamics: Lower BOE due to flexible 2x1→1x1 power plant configuration and gas reallocation to Belridge; choice maximizes cash flows over volumes .
- CCS/pipelines: First-of-kind injection targeted YE25; multiple EPA Class VI permits in queue; California legislature progressing CO₂ pipeline framework—key catalyst for scaling .
- Capital returns: Opportunistic buybacks doubled pace in Q1 due to perceived dislocation; 20% of shares issued in Aera merger repurchased at ~9% discount vs issuance .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 results beat S&P Global consensus on all key lines: adjusted EPS $1.07 vs $0.77*, revenue $912M vs $861.6M*, and S&P EBITDA actual $322.0M vs $283.5M* .
- With 2025 electricity margin raised (to $175–$190M) and consolidated G&A/operating costs lowered, sell-side models may need higher non-E&P contribution and lower cost run-rates; 2025 Adjusted EBITDAX range held at $1.1–$1.2B .
- Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat: Broad-based upside vs consensus and sequential improvement in adjusted EBITDAX, driven by cost execution and synergy realization .
- Guidance sturdiness: FY25 EBITDAX and production maintained while non-E&P profit pools (electricity margin) are higher and consolidated costs lower, enhancing earnings quality and visibility .
- Volume optics vs cash reality: Q2 BOE step-down is a conscious cash optimization (power/gas allocation); near-term prints may screen weaker on volumes but stronger on cash flow/margins .
- Defensive setup: ~70% oil hedged for 2025 and ~$34 Brent breakeven anchor downside protection in a volatile macro .
- Capital returns + de-leveraging: Record $258M returned in Q1 with additional debt redemption and $1.18B liquidity support continued buybacks/dividends .
- Structural catalysts: First CCS injection by YE25 and potential long-term PPA with hyperscalers can re-rate the power/CCS option value and diversify earnings .
- Watchlist items: Electricity margin realization vs guidance, Kern EIR progress and CO₂ pipeline framework, timing/terms of PPA, synergy conversion to NGL/gas monetization projects .
Notes:
- “Consensus” and “actual” fields marked with an asterisk (*) are Values retrieved from S&P Global.